bananamankevin
Sitting Out
Looking for some opinions from the chip community.
These River City chips were casino-canceled with hot-stamped gold starburst cancellation marks on the inlays. The common collector approach seems to be removing the cancel stamps to better reveal the original denomination and artwork underneath.
In the photo, the chips on the left still have the original cancel stamp intact. The chips on the right show examples of my removal attempts.
My process was a soak in 70% isopropyl alcohol followed by careful scrubbing with a Sonicare toothbrush head. Results were highly variable. The green $25s cleaned up fairly well, but many of the $5s and $100s retained significant gold residue. I suspect a lot depends on how deeply or evenly the original cancel stamp was applied.
The challenge is that even when the gold is mostly removed, there is often still visible residue and/or an indentation left in the inlay where the stamp was pressed. From a collector standpoint, I'm not sure whether a partially removed stamp actually looks better than an intact cancel. From a personal standpoint, the partially removed stamp looks terrible and triggers my OCD.
So I'm curious what others prefer:
These River City chips were casino-canceled with hot-stamped gold starburst cancellation marks on the inlays. The common collector approach seems to be removing the cancel stamps to better reveal the original denomination and artwork underneath.
In the photo, the chips on the left still have the original cancel stamp intact. The chips on the right show examples of my removal attempts.
My process was a soak in 70% isopropyl alcohol followed by careful scrubbing with a Sonicare toothbrush head. Results were highly variable. The green $25s cleaned up fairly well, but many of the $5s and $100s retained significant gold residue. I suspect a lot depends on how deeply or evenly the original cancel stamp was applied.
The challenge is that even when the gold is mostly removed, there is often still visible residue and/or an indentation left in the inlay where the stamp was pressed. From a collector standpoint, I'm not sure whether a partially removed stamp actually looks better than an intact cancel. From a personal standpoint, the partially removed stamp looks terrible and triggers my OCD.
So I'm curious what others prefer:
- Leave the original cancel stamps intact?
- Remove them completely when possible?
- Attempt removal even if some residue remains?