New home game advice (2 Viewers)

Emerg3nce

New Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2026
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Rewards
0
Location
Minnesota
How would you handle this??

Did my first home game about a week ago. Just a $40 buy in .10/.20 nl holdem cash game.

The night was a lot of fun drinks flowed and people generally enjoyed it. However, one player (tom) was slightly annoying to the majority of the table.... he drank alot. And by the end of the night it was obvious he was trashed..
Not necessarily a problem as the plan was to drink and play cards...
However, the poker got to be just a game of slots..
Ie he would jam his stack over any raise. With any two cards. And this is about how the last hour and a half of play went.
He bought in 5 times..
Now I am probably the most serious poker player in the group. And I realize this is actually a good thing.
But the other guys have reached out to me and have said it made the game not fun..

How would you navigate this?
 
It's your game. Do you feel it was detrimental to your experience and/or the experience of your players? Are you interested in maintaining your current player pool at the cost of not inviting tom? If yes to either, you simply don't have to invite Tom back. Again it's your game. There could be more background to this that tom is your BFF and it would feel wrong to exclude them, then maybe a conversation is in order. Based on information given, a polite "tables full this week" or quiet quit is reasonable.
 
If your focus is fun and you want to keep hosting, give him a break for a few games. Assess the situation and go from there.
 
Talk to him one on one. Check in to make sure it was fun, then let him know the drinking got real annoying. Some drunks don't realize just how annoying they are. Yes the money would be good but time is a currency, if I took time away from wife n life I don't want to waste it listening to the annoying guy.

Sometimes its a one-off, tough day and skipped dinner, but for others this is a pattern of behavior over decades. Very different situations in my mind.
 
It's your game. Do you feel it was detrimental to your experience and/or the experience of your players? Are you interested in maintaining your current player pool at the cost of not inviting tom? If yes to either, you simply don't have to invite Tom back. Again it's your game. There could be more background to this that tom is your BFF and it would feel wrong to exclude them, then maybe a conversation is in order. Based on information given, a polite "tables full this week" or quiet quit is reasonable.
From my perspective as the host. He was fun until he wasnt.. which was maybe 1-2 hours.

At which point he made the poker less fun for the majority of the table.. suggestions i received from the group is limiting number of buy ins to two. The thought is if he has to tread lighter he will play more normal.... although to me that seems like a bad idea.. cause if I get KK vs AA twice and am out then I can't play..

I think the point is for majority of the table a buy in is actually worth playing smart.. ie the money matter..

I think for tom it doesnt.

🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
It's an issue of how much you value having a fun environment for the rest kf the group and long term health of your game vs how muxh you value the easy money on the table.

I would just have a one on one with him
 
I took this right off our club Discord page.

Speaking of rules…
I provide beverages, but not booze. I do have refrigerator and cooler space if you like, but booze is on you. If you drink, drink well. Don’t be an ass. Anyone who is causing a problem will be given a friendly warning. The second will be less so and you’ll be asked to leave. If you are asked to leave a second time, you won’t be welcome back. Ever.

I’d give him a warning and make a similar rule. You’re right that it’s easy pickings and if I’m playing at a casino, I’m happy to take the drunk money. At my home…no thanks. I realize I’m a fuddy daddy when it comes to boozing. I subjected my household to enough private drunken ass shows for a lifetime. So, maybe I’m overly sensitive to it, but it’s my house, so my rules. But, since it’s been made clear up front, it’s never been a problem at my game.
 
Agree with most here. It must be addressed for the sake of your game.

Better to lose one than more than one if others are bothered, see nothing being done, and skip your game.
 
suggestions i received from the group is limiting number of buy ins to two.
I personally hate 'flock shoot' solutions for an individual problem.

A cash game limited to two buy-ins wouldn't be any fun at all for my crew - that's just an invitation to either become super tight, or else to leave after an hour.
 
I personally hate 'flock shoot' solutions for an individual problem.

A cash game limited to two buy-ins wouldn't be any fun at all for my crew - that's just an invitation to either become super tight, or else to leave after an hour.
💯
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom