What is the biggest set you own ? (1 Viewer)

Gotta be my 05 CDIs
View attachment 715991
Older pic... currently 6,430 chips (not including rebuy/ seating/ extras or my quarters that are not relabeled yet) but does include 160 47mm bounties.
That is a big set!
Wow to get them all in action.....


This is my biggest set,
3575 Sloth Club Secondary chips on the cards mold
RZwGAir.jpg


2nd biggest at 2520 (300-1,20-25 not pictured still new in box)
QlgEyrB.jpg
 
Nope. I own an 8-man table, and there’s not very much parking in my neighborhood, so I’m cool with 800 chip sets.
This is a good point. Even a 600 chip set is adequate for any single table big bet game. Expanding to 800-1000 allows for some stake flexibility or limit games. Anything beyond that assumes multi table events which most of us aspire to but very few actually run.
 
Nope. I own an 8-man table, and there’s not very much parking in my neighborhood, so I’m cool with 800 chip sets.
Those 8 players could still show up with a stack of high society each; that's 80k in cash bank you'd need :)

Fine, here's my biggest single non-mixed set. It's small, but mighty:

 
Nope. I own an 8-man table, and there’s not very much parking in my neighborhood, so I’m cool with 800 chip sets.
No one asked, but this is the very issue I’ve been grappling with in this phase I’m called “editing”. So far, this is the criteria list I’ve developed:

- If I don’t feel like i would ever want to play with the chips, in whatever stakes, they have to go. (This is, for example, why I’ll be listing my entire WTHC set soon, because as much as I try to like them, and I’ve owned them 3 times in 10 months, I can’t get myself to love them.)

- If I think of them as “collectible”, I don’t mind having larger sets, even though not all chips will see play.

- Non collectibles (cash sets) have to be trimmed down to playable size, to play in, or across the following: $0.25/$0.50, $1/$1, $2/$5, $5/$10, $25/$50, $100/$200.

- Only THC and TRK for now. One RHC set (Jack high denoms).
 
Last edited:
No one asked, but this is the very issue I’ve been grappling with in this phase I’m called “editing”. So far, this is the criteria list I’ve developed:

- If I don’t feel like i would ever want to play with the chips, in whatever stakes, they have to go. (This is, for example, why I’ll be listing my entire WHTC set soon, because as much as I try to like them, and I’ve owned them 3 times in 10 months, I can’t get myself to love them.)

- If I think of them as “collectible”, I don’t mind having larger sets, even though not all chips will see play.

- Non collectibles (cash sets) have to be trimmed down to playable size, to play in, or across the following: $0.25/$0.50, $1/$1, $2/$5, $5/$10, $25/$50, $100/$200.

- Only THC and TRK for now. One RHC set (Jack high denoms).
Curious how you'd go about defining a set as "collectible" or "non-collectible"? Number of chips "in circulation"? Age? History behind them (WSOP comes to mind)?
 
No one asked, but this is the very issue I’ve been grappling with in this phase I’m called “editing”. So far, this is the criteria list I’ve developed:

- If I don’t feel like i would ever want to play with the chips, in whatever stakes, they have to go. (This is, for example, why I’ll be listing my entire WHTC set soon, because as much as I try to like them, and I’ve owned them 3 times in 10 months, I can’t get myself to love them.)

- If I think of them as “collectible”, I don’t mind having larger sets, even though not all chips will see play.

- Non collectibles (cash sets) have to be trimmed down to playable size, to play in, or across the following: $0.25/$0.50, $1/$1, $2/$5, $5/$10, $25/$50, $100/$200.

- Only THC and TRK for now. One RHC set (Jack high denoms).
I posted that as a passive aggressive shot at hoarders. Though your methodology is sound, I think you’ll have to do some more heavy editing to get off that list.
 
I posted that as a passive aggressive shot at hoarders. Though your methodology is sound, I think you’ll have to do some more heavy editing to get off that list.
Hell, I currently have 5 cash sets (which all see play) for just about 6000 chips, plus a cards mold tournament set on-route with another 800+ chips, and I already sometimes feel like what I have is completely exaggerated. Then I think about what some people on here own and I suddenly can sleep again at night. :ROFL: :ROFLMAO:
 
Curious how you'd go about defining a set as "collectible" or "non-collectible"? Number of chips "in circulation"? Age? History behind them (WSOP comes to mind)?
To me it's a mix of all of these and it depends. I'm kind of similar on a much smaller scale. For instance, I don't consider my WTHC set collectible, it's just very practical in use - so, it only consists of what I'll need and get into play. My PCA secondary set, while a set I will put into play, I also consider collectible. So, I've got $1k plaques which will probably very rarely if ever see play, as well as the quarter and nickel tokens. They're more to complete the collectability of the set.
 
I posted that as a passive aggressive shot at hoarders. Though your methodology is sound, I think you’ll have to do some more heavy editing to get off that list.
I think if it was possible to buy what you need, when you need it, most folks would do that. Since that isn’t usually possible, people buy what they might need in the future, when they have the opportunity. That’s why most of my casino sets are 2kish in size while my CPC sets are 1k and 600 chips respectively.

There are not too many cpc sets that are huge and unused in my observation. People either buy appropriate sizes or have regular big games that require the numbers.
 
- If I don’t feel like i would ever want to play with the chips, in whatever stakes, they have to go. (This is, for example, why I’ll be listing my entire WHTC set soon, because as much as I try to like them, and I’ve owned them 3 times in 10 months, I can’t get myself to love them.)

- Non collectibles (cash sets) have to be trimmed down to playable size, to play in, or across the following: $0.25/$0.50, $1/$1, $2/$5, $5/$10, $25/$50, $100/$200.
The only paulsons that have really interested me at all in the last few years were the HSI primaries....(cinci ncv was a chance pick up mostly for the 25's as quarters for the hsi). The only set I had before was a big pharaoh set that I liked because I enjoy my ancient history but that was sold for bigger and better things at the time years ago. I rode horses professionally for a few years in my 20's before a few injuries that landed me working in healthcare. This is just a natural set for me and the colours are just perfect for what I would have ordered in a commercial chip of my choice. Also now having a playable NCV tourney specific set means I can have a tourney and cash game like a real casino with a horsey theme. I had china clay milano's with a crazy horse theme but like riding a few nice horses its tough to go back to riding claimers. But I was not impressed with those enough to want to keep them given the other option available....and down the chipping rabbit hole I went. That milano set was perfectly fine and good but with slight size/texture variances from chip to chip made them frustrating to work with compared to more uniform paulson's. Keep what you like, move the gear that still has value which you do not plan to use while it still has value to others.

I agree on your noncollectable sets being purpose built.... All of mine are set up with the idea of having a cash and tourney game operating at the same time with in theory the ability to play with the same style/theme of chips in both games without chips crossing over from game versions. Typically my games would start with a tournament and a cash game often would start mid or after the tournament end. Usually there is just one cash table in this format which is typically 1/2 but I have options as low as 0.05-0.10 to 100/200 if things ever get that inflated...
 
Last edited:
I posted that as a passive aggressive shot at hoarders. Though your methodology is sound, I think you’ll have to do some more heavy editing to get off that list.
With all due respect, I care two hoots about any list of yours I'm on -- your post just echoed a process I'm in the middle of. I think you're a great chipper, but judgmental af, and that's cool. We did business, and it went smoothly, so you're OK in my book. :)
 
2,000 sixteen-stripe plastics for playing with Mountains Of Chips
1,000 Spirit mold china clays for playing with Piles Of Chips

... plus 13 other sets ranging in size from 300 to 500 for playing with small groups and modest stacks, covering various plastic, ceramic, clay, and bone chips, from vintage to modern eras.

I am an r-selecting collector.
 
Krish, safe to say it doesn't surprise any one of us that you don't care about other's perspectives, opinions, or outlook on things in the forum. I fail to understand why you continue to present yourself in self-righteous light whenever addressing others. Out of anybody that would ask this question, I'm pretty sure I should be the absolute very last since it may be misconstrued but I still have to ask; why is it that you continue to speak down to people on PCF and passive-aggressively belittle them? Sure you sprinkle in some nice words here and there but what's the deal here? Pretty sure I'm asking this question on behalf of many.
Nah, I started that one. Pretty sure he's entitled to a reply, there.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom