Rodog123
High Hand
this Poker room has been plagued with issues for years. -See if you can spot the dealer cheating.
https://x.com/shaundeeb/status/1785613774616957327
https://x.com/shaundeeb/status/1785613774616957327
There’s no gaming commission for a Texas card room - that’s the problem with Texas cardrooms.The player should have called the police made a report and called the gaming commission.
Yeah it is…no one watches the dealers. This idiot is practicing and just learned how to do it probably. Glad they caught him. Smart to not tip him off by complaining and instead record it.That’s some very sloppy cheating. You’d think if they were going to do this in a cardroom, they’d at least be good at it!
then one would expect the call to the police would carry more weightThere’s no gaming commission for a Texas card room - that’s the problem with Texas cardrooms.
For those of us with untrained eyes, can someone explain how they could spot the fake shuffling?
Also, was every single riffle a fake shuffle?
I think I can see how he tried to set the deck at the beginning, but the rest looked like a normal shuffle to me.
Who is anti-shuffler here? Most players I think would prefer to have a shuffler in their setup. They are just anti-paying-a-ton for shufflers .I know there are people here that are very anti-shuffler, but I would think that be a better solution. A crooked dealer can manipulate a deck very well. (this one was not done well).
This is a very old technique. Jay Ose, as technical advisor for "The Cincinnati Kid" demonstrated this to Joan Blondell in a featurette related to the film.Hope this helps ...
I liked his patter, its definitive and direct, the double lifts were nice as well but not as much skill as the false shuffleThis is a very old technique. Jay Ose, as technical advisor for "The Cincinnati Kid" demonstrated this to Joan Blondell in a featurette related to the film.
Hello!Who is anti-shuffler here? Most players I think would prefer to have a shuffler in their setup. They are just anti-paying-a-ton for shufflers .
There are a few here who lost big pots and are somewhat conspiracy theorists who state the only way coolers happen is with rigged shufflers ....Who is anti-shuffler here? Most players I think would prefer to have a shuffler in their setup. They are just anti-paying-a-ton for shufflers .
Oh that's a good point. It didn't even dawn on me about using a shuffler with pass the deck. What you are explaining makes sense, if you were to try that.Hello!
For a self dealt game, yeah I’m anti-shuffler. You really can’t get any faster, game-pace wise than a 2-deck setup. I don’t care if you’re shuffling ahead or shuffling behind - there’s always a fresh deck ready as the pot is raked.
With a shuffler, the shuffler stays in one place while the decks have to be passed back and forth to it and from it? That’s awkward and slow. Not to mention, of the two products on the market, shufflemasters are really loud and kinda slow, while deckmates have this programmable issue that people shouldn’t trust outside of a regulated casino.
If you have a dealer (or if you’re the dealer,) sure a shuffler speeds things up.
I've played it games like that. I'm not saying it's bad. There's just no advantage, unless you have players who are incapable of shuffling.Oh that's a good point. It didn't even dawn on me about using a shuffler with pass the deck.
Oh I should add that in the Director's commentary, Jewison said some of the close up shots of "Lady Finger's" hands when she was dealing the big game are in fact Ose's hands wearing nail polish.This is a very old technique. Jay Ose, as technical advisor for "The Cincinnati Kid" demonstrated this to Joan Blondell in a featurette related to the film.
Obv answer is obvious: install a shuffler between each player seat, with one deck per shuffler. Totally minimizes deck movement -- remove deck, deal, then back into shuffler for next orbit.For a self dealt game, yeah I’m anti-shuffler. You really can’t get any faster, game-pace wise than a 2-deck setup. I don’t care if you’re shuffling ahead or shuffling behind - there’s always a fresh deck ready as the pot is raked.
With a shuffler, the shuffler stays in one place while the decks have to be passed back and forth to it and from it? That’s awkward and slow.
Yeah, it doesn't fix that problem.Most players I think would prefer to have a shuffler in their setup. They are just anti-paying-a-ton for shufflers .