Snappers in a 50¢/$1 game? (1 Viewer)

TheYeti

3 of a Kind
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Messages
563
Reaction score
870
Location
Rapid City, SD
I'm jumping in on Justin's next Tina group buy and while mulling over my breakdown I thought about including some snappers. We'll be playing 50¢/$1 cash, do snappers make sense for these stakes? Are moar chips always better??

Also, I'm hoping by including snappers maybe my game won't play quite as big as it has been lately with less $5s on the table...maybe that's delusional.
 
Woo! Its not efficient, but nothing about Tinas should be efficiency based. Go for it if your players would use them.
 
I tried using snappers once in a .25/.50 game, because I didn’t have enough $5s. I didn’t like it and I’ll probably never try again. They’re not THAT difficult to count, but they’re more difficult. They’re just not intuitive - you glance at somebody’s stack and you have to think. Who needs that? I vote no.
 
I tried using snappers once in a .25/.50 game, because I didn’t have enough $5s. I didn’t like it and I’ll probably never try again. They’re not THAT difficult to count, but they’re more difficult. They’re just not intuitive - you glance at somebody’s stack and you have to think. Who needs that? I vote no.
Agreed. I think snappers were mainly for blackjack/ rake / drop kinda play for the most part vs ‘normal’ stakes poker.

In my last .50/$1 game, I did initial buy in’s from $100-$200, with match half stack.

If buy in at $200 get the full preset rack, if $100, I remove one barrel of $5s for the following breakdown and easy to hand out:

Initial stack:
12x 25c ($3)
22x $1 ($22)
35x $5 ($175)

IMG_4263.jpeg


This game ended up way bigger than I thought it would, ended up with about $3.2k on the table, with 5 racks of 5’s and about a barrel of $25s in play by end of the night, here’s my stack at the end and the table at cash out:

IMG_4281.jpeg


IMG_4280.jpeg


I think it probably comes down to a few things that’ll set the ‘size’ of your game and if you want to control it, probably these 4 will have a bigger impact than the types of chip denoms. The only change I’d make is I’d probably reduce the fracs from 12 to 8 and bump up a $1 chip. I went heavy on 5’s in my cash set, so consciously try to get most of them out before the $25s. I wouldn’t add a snapper.

1. Initial buy in (I wanted folk to be able to buy in for up to 200 bigs, but 100 bigs also could work)
2. Match half stack - we had one player felt a few folk fairly early on, so this meant folk could add on/ rebuy above $200. I liked Chris Manzoni’s youtube series on tips for sustainable cash games, he advises to keep rebuys/add ons to the original amount - not match half stack. I might try that in the future.
3. Types of players: I have a mix, about a third of the table regularly play higher stakes and were fairly aggressive - so didn’t think twice about add ons/rebuys - I think point 2 would be best to avoid the cash on the table getting out of hand
4. Blinds - I’ve set my next game to .25/.50, $50-$100 buy in, still with match half stack since I’ve got a few newer folk joining so will see how that goes.

GL!
 
Last edited:
In a word "No"

If you want to break PCF just do:
50c, snapper, 10
For a nice x5 x4 ramp up.

But to reiterate...
In a word "No"

If you want an excuse to buy them you can tell yourself you'll play 2-5 one day as 2.5 - 5 with no 1s in play.

But to reiterate again...
In a word "No"
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom
Cart