Agree, would assume we would want guidance on max level spot patterns (potentially by denom/value), inlay shape vs not, and any mold restrictions.
CPC is moving! (17 Viewers)
- Thread starter CPC_Mike
- Start date
A cash AND tournament set (of the same design/theme) would be epic! Just saying…
Anonymize the submissions — for the vote, just show the designs, not who created them, until one is chosen.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2022
- Messages
- 1,612
- Reaction score
- 2,876
Let us know when the inventory is being moved...for reasons.
davesilver88
3 of a Kind
Can I like this post twice? Really good idea.
Poker Zombie
Royal Flush
Denied.
If I make a design that could win me a set based on popular vote, I'm PM'ing all my cronies to stuff the ballot-box.
Best chance is to have CPC_Mike narrow the field to just 2. The popular kids will still have the edge, but at least votes for the lesser-known designers won't be divided.
Last edited:
ekricket
Royal Flush
If a level playing field is desired I’d make them all use the same software to produce them as well. Some of the professional designers have thousands of dollars of software to manipulate their products with ease, the average guy is still using PowerPoint and MS paint.
Please don’t hate on people that can only afford basic software/freeware or hardware for this kind of thing. It’s just not cool.
Poker Zombie
Royal Flush
The idea is creating a new stock set that will be able to fly off the CPC shelves. Nobody cares if the designer used illustrator or MS paint. Nobody cares if the designer is popular. They want an eye-catching set that will sell.
ekricket
Royal Flush
No I get it. We just have a much broader member base now and some creative people may be limited in their offerings by circumstance beyond their control. Just trying to be inclusive. Not directed at you at all, sorry.
The idea is creating a new stock set that will be able to fly off the CPC shelves. Nobody cares if the designer used illustrator or MS paint. Nobody cares if the designer is popular. They want an eye-catching set that will sell.
Regardless of whether the official design submissions are anonymous, people will certainly be aware who created what design. We're dealing with people here. People talk.
Colquhoun
4 of a Kind
The software doesn’t make a designer. Someone buying an expensive hammer doesn’t make them a master carpenter.
Good design is good design, regardless of the medium.
So we will get a stock "Pacific Club" design then?
davesilver88
3 of a Kind
Hm, ya maybe anonymous entry, in theory, is a good idea - but isn’t really practical if people are gonna just DM their peeps to upvote their design.
And as far as limiting the software, that just seems silly to me. I can understand the reasoning behind it, but the flip side to that coin is that now you’re limiting the pro/am designers that have access to those softwares. Agree to disagree, but I’m not buying that one.
Our opinions are meaningless anyway, we can share our opinions but ultimately CPCMIKE will set the rules.
And as far as limiting the software, that just seems silly to me. I can understand the reasoning behind it, but the flip side to that coin is that now you’re limiting the pro/am designers that have access to those softwares. Agree to disagree, but I’m not buying that one.
Our opinions are meaningless anyway, we can share our opinions but ultimately CPCMIKE will set the rules.
OP
OP
Two things for certain:
1) All entries will be submitted via the Poker Chip Design Tool
2) There will be no limitation on what software someone uses to create their inlays. A good design is a good design and will outshine the software used to create it.
I don't know about the other stuff yet but rest assured that I read everything and take everyone's opinion seriously and will do whatever I can to level the playing field. The point of having PCF vote on the entries was to engage the community and use your history and experience to help pick a design that would have the best appeal to enthusiasts. If we can't find a way to make that part of it work fairly then we'll figure out some other way to pick the winner.
1) All entries will be submitted via the Poker Chip Design Tool
2) There will be no limitation on what software someone uses to create their inlays. A good design is a good design and will outshine the software used to create it.
I don't know about the other stuff yet but rest assured that I read everything and take everyone's opinion seriously and will do whatever I can to level the playing field. The point of having PCF vote on the entries was to engage the community and use your history and experience to help pick a design that would have the best appeal to enthusiasts. If we can't find a way to make that part of it work fairly then we'll figure out some other way to pick the winner.
Whatever the winning design is, I hope it can be done on a mold that supports both 39 and 44. I've been wanting a mixed sized scroll set for a while.
Would be nice to see new spot/color combos.
CPC
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=1
ASM (American)
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=5
ASM (Atlantic)
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=4
CPC
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=1
ASM (American)
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=5
ASM (Atlantic)
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/poker-chip-database/categories/custom-sets.2/chip-search?mfr_brand=4
AlbinoDragon
Flush
...but being a PCF "poll", I 100% expect a bunch of designs leaning on level 4 through level 7 spot patterns that mostly rely on day-glo colors and bright white as a base that mostly look like Hello Kitty hacked up a Rainbow Brite or Strawberry Shortcake hariball onto a chip as the submissions:
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/resources/categories/poker-chip-hall-of-fame.6/
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/tiger-palace-faq.98459/
...because that's what the masses here want, but are far from what is realistic as a viable stock design.
Hah! I feel called out
Here’s my favorite secondary cali set being made… 
and most of the recent HoF stumps were fairly bright cali sets until @Irish came in with the Old Testament stumps. Which are also glorious.
My recommendation that I mentioned before would an overall target price for a standard 0.25/1/5/25/100 600 piece set and that’s it. That’ll at least put a realistic constraint on all maxed out spot levels, but I don’t think they’re be a limit on creativity of colors/dayglo etc.
Don’t think @CPC_Mike wants this, however… if you want to have a few more categories in the competition:
1. Classical Vegas colors (could be the more muted retro tones)
2. Cali colors (unicorn dayglo sprinkles)
3. Tournie set
4. NCV for a limit set
Either way he’ll get a ton of free design suggestions to see. I’m assuming PCF is a considerable part of the custom market and he’ll want a popular design that’ll sell, so no point getting a purist design that wins but doesn’t sell.
My own submission will be Jolly Rogerz. Exact same as @Cratty but with a z so he can’t sue me.
Imitation is the sincerest form of thievery.I'm sure there will be a ton of new design material/inspirations.....er knockoffs for Tina chips once the designs start rolling in. Flattery and all that.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account and join our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.
Similar threads
