guinness
Flush
Meh, that first statement is true for every single game example you can conjure. The second statement, however, is pure elitist bs.
Back at you.
Meh, that first statement is true for every single game example you can conjure. The second statement, however, is pure elitist bs.
My 3rd, 4th, and 5th sentences cover that situation.
Player A is drawing dead and Player B isn't holding the nuts the discussion for running it is going to be very fast -
see my post above (post #48) -- http://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/running-it-twice-etiquette.14185/page-2#post-241388I really don't understand the reluctance to turn over the cards that most people have expressed here. What exactly is the concern?
They get 2/3 of the pot.Probably a dumb question, but if you run it 3 times and one player wins twice, they get 2/3s of the pot? or all of the pot?
I assumed 2/3s, which sounds like a nightmare for some of the guys I play with (if normal splits are anything to go by), but some of the posts in this thread seem to indicate that the player winning twice may get all of the pot?
Probably a dumb question, but if you run it 3 times and one player wins twice, they get 2/3s of the pot? or all of the pot?
I assumed 2/3s, which sounds like a nightmare for some of the guys I play with (if normal splits are anything to go by), but some of the posts in this thread seem to indicate that the player winning twice may get all of the pot?
see my post above (post #48) -- http://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/running-it-twice-etiquette.14185/page-2#post-241388
So, for sake of etiquette, provided the number of looks remains the same, I'm obligated to accept all future requests for more looks in that session because I requested more looks or accepted one earlier in the session?
Conversely, am I obligated to refuse if I refused earlier?
Again, number of times being run remains constant
Don't play 10 handed PLO that sounds brutal, problem solvedNot necessarily an etiquette question but more a mechanics: if playing 10-handed PLO, how should a full board be run twice? (4 x 10 = 40, 12 cards left). I'd assume it would go: burn, flop, burn, turn, burn, river, burn, flop, shuffle burns, burn, turn, burn, river. The other option would be to shuffle burns into stub after first river. Never run into it but I tend to think of rare occasions lol.
Don't play 10 handed PLO that sounds brutal, problem solved
burn, deal both flops, burn, deal both turn cards face-up and then deal both rivers.face down. 1+6+1+2+2 = 12 cards. Turn over the two river cards only when/if appropriate.how should a full board be run twice? (4 x 10 = 40, 12 cards left).
Also, not as likely to get AIPF in PLO, so typically you only need to run the last 2 cards twice.