Poker Zombie
Royal Flush
By my calculations, the total rake was 6%.
I'd be thrilled to play in any tournment where the rake was only 6% - that's less than half of what I'm used to.
You think this should be a not-for-profit event?
I'm not suggesting a not-for-profit venture. Not even remotely.
However, They are actively doing next to nothing to provide a pleasant gaming experience.
It's like spending $100 on a steak dinner, and getting a tough, flavorless steak. At a certain price point, I expect... nay, demand an improved level of service. Yet sheeple keep streaming into the WSOP for a - and I don't say this lightly - the absolute worst professional poker experience you can ever experience.
I've been twice. The first time I thought "well, maybe they missed a few marks". Then I tried again and realised they aren't trying to improve anything more than the bottom line. I don't put it all on Jack Effel (WSOP TD), because I suspect he has little to do with chip counts, chairs, seating, dealers, and even event organization, but someone is responsible for the shit-show that says a meer 9% increase (when 5% is pretty standard) in attendance results in a chip deficiency.
Plan for the worst, hope for the best. Make contingency plans. That's how I host. That's how I hosted for profit conventions. That's how I treat fundraiser events.
Why would you do it differently?