Tanking...for what? (1 Viewer)

PhilLaFond

Straight
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
886
Reaction score
928
Location
On the coast of somewhere beautiful
I'm very well aware that I'm an average recreational player, but I'm always interested in learning, trying to improve, and understand how better players think. With that, I'd like to describe a hand from a recent session at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs and get some viewpoints. Game is 1/2, full table. Been at the table about 2 hrs, it's relatively conservative. No obvious tells and have seen no bluffs at all. Avg open raise is $8-10.

Player A in mid position with a stack of about $500 opens to $14. Player B to his immediate left min raises to $28. Player A has him covered, but not by much. Button (player C - $400 effective) calls, blinds fold, Player A calls quickly. I was in the small blind - intrigued by what was going on as this was unusual action for this table. A and B are in their early 60s, not playing tons of hands and have only showed strength at showdown. B maybe is a little more speculative, but not much. Both seem competent, B loves to talk about how much he plays in AC and Vegas.

Flops comes 7, 3, K all diamonds. Player A bets out $80. Player B thinks for a minute and calls. Player C flashes me AJ off (no diamond) and folds, grumbling. Turn is a 6c. Player A goes all in. Player B tanks forever. Apologizes to the table and continues to talk. I know you have a set of Kings, blah blah blah. Hell I knew that, and I'm not that good. I also know B doesn't have aces, or I'm sure he raises the flop bet. Tank tank tank - "I have a pair and a flush draw" he says. Finally he folds face up, a pair of 9s, one of which was a diamond.

So - thoughts on the action? Min raise pre flop the right move? Call pre flop by C with AJ off make sense? Calling the flop bet correct? Was there really that much to think about after the all in bet? Other thoughts you have??
 
Last edited:
i'm okay with the min-raise pre by player B, but the flop is a fold as is the turn. player A turns up with AA, KK or AK (and usually with a diamond in the AA and AK hands) here 90+% of the time. player B was tanking for the same reason he was talking - he's there for socializing as much as playing poker and just wants to hollywood a bit.

AJo is a terrible call for $28 and a bad call even for $14 when the raise is a rock in MP.
 
1. I don't hate the PF re-raise by player B. Prefer to see higher... though the conservative game, is A doing that with AK, AQ, AJ, 88, 77?
2. cold call by AJ is just bad
3. Donkbet by player A on the flop is okay. Dead to made flush, but good as blocker bet to Ace of diamonds. donkbet likely better than check raise.
4. Player B flop call is bad
5. Player C flop fold good.
6. Player B tank bad, fold good. Does Player B know that a flush loses to full house?

Looks like Player B hates money. Continue to play with him.
 
Call pre, hate the minraise. Fold flop. Snap fold turn. Player B is awful. Player C is awful. If Player A really had KK, then he's awful too. You hit the trifecta. [emoji39]
 
Players A open raises to $14, bigger than the table norm and bigger than his normal raise. Player B min raises with pocket nines, (presumably to isolate?) This is terrible play - A's range is bigger pairs or two over-cards. Does B plan to fold if A re-raises? What does B plan to do with a low SPR and a flop with a couple of over-cards? It seems to me that B turns his pocket pair into a bluff more than anything else with his min raise.

C cold calling with AJo is a mistake with a classic trouble hand in a highly constested pot.

A decides to flat rather than 4-bet. Curious. Let's just say I don't think KK is in his primary range.

We get a monochrome flop, three way action and $84 in the pot (SPR < 6) and A leads out a pot sized bet rather than go for a check raise. This is an invitation to play for stacks or perhaps a bluff. B flats with 99 and a weak flush draw. C folds.

The board pairs and A jams all in. $244 in pot, jam is $392 or 1.6 pot. If A holds the top full house, this is a terrible play, If A is semi-bluffing or perhaps playing top pair, then the play makes a bit more sense. B folds properly.

I think Hero's read of the table and the villains might be bit too conservative unless this hand is a massive outlier.

A's play is hard to evaluate without seeing his hand. It is successful in winning a nice pot - - - - <shrug> nice hand?
B's play is filled with mistakes until he folds. Preflop is a limp or fold given Hero's read. Flop is a fold
C's play is a typical tourist mistake. He was lucky not to flop top pair and get stacked.

DrStrange
 
I doubt player A had kings. The board suddenly became unscary with the 3 pairing the turn. Why bet the guy off? More likely he had AK or AA no diamond.
 
Sorry guys - reading all the posts I just realized a typo. Turn was a 6c. My amateur thoughts - suspicious of the re- raise, thought maybe high pair trying to induce more action from A. Thought C might be set mining. Initially thought A might have 10s or JJ based on his opening bet size. When he didn't re-pop I figured he didn't have AA - would have expected an isolation move here.

OP corrected.
 
Last edited:
For what it is worth . . . I think player A is semibluffing with the ace high flush draw. I look at Hero's description of the table and think this is a place where stiff bluffs work almost all the time.

DrStrange
 
You're probably right. With his c-bet my immediate read was a set of kings, worried about AA with the diamond or any strong flush draw. Wonder if a shove from B over the $80 flop bet might have worked...FWIW, casino only allows it to be run once.
 
B doesn't know how the turn is going to play out - so he can't make the assumptions we might make after watching the whole hand. A's range is fairly bounded by the preflop action, but a hand like AK or AQs are certainly part of the range.

B has a rio problem holding pocket nines and very little information about who is ahead. B wins $168 if the bluff works and loses $324 when it fails, so the bluff has to work a third of the time to break even. A might decide he has good enough odds to draw with a naked ace, and even then A has 14 outs twice to make a hand better than nines - a little better than even money vs the nines..

I could see A folding QQ/JJ/TT or a pure bluff. Maybe he folds AK/AA without a flush draw. Maybe A folds a naked ace high draw. The bluff wouldn't be crazy but I think a flop bluff by B is at least adventuresome.

DrStrange
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom