Lol i'd probably agree since I'm usually a fan of super simple inlay stylesAfter seeing the hundo in person I’m a believer. Maybe a tad busy from what I’d normally like, but I’m not even sure how/if I’d change anything.
When personal custom sets are listed by the owners for rating, it's always difficult for me. We're talking about inlays/labels created by legendary designers that hold a special place in the hearts of the owners. On top of that, base/spot patterns and colors have been carefully designed by chip hobbyists who generally understand the importance of spot progression.
That being said...fuck this safari shit. I give it a -6. You may want to add that to your poll.
I give it a 4. Really classy.
Your fault. You didn't find the other one until I'd finished the setI’d give it a 5 but I don’t like the font for the denomination.
Inlay only. I'm a big boy. Do your worstDon't ask if you don't want the truth right? Were not talking edge spot progression, just the inlay
Too cartoony. Gimmicky edge spots in the theme of the animal on the chip. Wildly inconsistent sizing of the animal (need banana for scale). Overall looks like something a teenage girl that’s failing are would draw on her math binder.
YMMV though.
Oof. I'm with ya, everyone gets an opinion. Just judging the inlay for thread purposes though, not edge spots.Too cartoony. Gimmicky edge spots in the theme of the animal on the chip. Wildly inconsistent sizing of the animal (need banana for scale). Overall looks like something a teenage girl that’s failing are would draw on her math binder.
YMMV though.
Just posted mine. Any and all discussion welcome.
Hit me with anything you want lol
Voted, based on above sentiments -- thanks for making the category available, Mike.I'm voting ZERO for all inlays submitted by their owner in a pathetic attempt to bolster their insecurities.
I've also placed my more embarrassing set up for votes if that changes your view. Those are getting hammered lolVoted, based on above sentiments -- thanks for making the category available, Mike.
These inlays are split-color (ala Outpost), have white denominations, use FOUR different fonts (really?), and have silhouettes that are way too hard to discern. They also contain images that are repeated across multiple inlays (yet not ALL inlays), as if the artist simply ran out of tree ideas. You'd think that five strikes would be enough for them to never make actual production.
As stand-alone inlays, I give 'em an 8 on a 10-scale. When considering the color-matching aspects and chip color/spot configurations, they bump to a solid 9 among custom chips. Probably could have made 10 had the Paulson color palette been available, and had the denomination font been better matched to the theme.
Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah - Wait. Oh Shit. Yeah what in the living fu*k Mike, why do the $20 and $100 have the exact same tree?!? Ffs, now you have to order more (new) labels. Please send me the additional chip or inlay when they come in, thanks.Voted, based on above sentiments -- thanks for making the category available, Mike.
These inlays are split-color (ala Outpost), have white denominations, use FOUR different fonts (really?), and have silhouettes that are way too hard to discern. They also contain images that are repeated across multiple inlays (yet not ALL inlays), as if the artist simply ran out of tree ideas. You'd think that five strikes would be enough for them to never make actual production.
As stand-alone inlays, I give 'em an 8 on a 10-scale. When considering the color-matching aspects and chip color/spot configurations, they bump to a solid 9 among custom chips. Probably could have made 10 had the Paulson color palette been available, and had the denomination font been better matched to the theme.