markleteenie
4 of a Kind
Philosophical situation:
Let's say you have 2-3 racks each of a very limited quantity/desirable chipset. Is it "better" (this is where the debate comes in) to have one playable set or break it up into 2-300 samples that 2-300 people can "enjoy," but is not actually playable.
Does the level of happiness brought to many people by having a sample outweigh the fact that the chips are not fulfilling their intended destiny/purpose (to be played) by being in a playable amount?
I can see both sides of the situation.
Disclaimer: I am not talking about any recent or past situation, just a thought I had about chip destiny.
Let's say you have 2-3 racks each of a very limited quantity/desirable chipset. Is it "better" (this is where the debate comes in) to have one playable set or break it up into 2-300 samples that 2-300 people can "enjoy," but is not actually playable.
Does the level of happiness brought to many people by having a sample outweigh the fact that the chips are not fulfilling their intended destiny/purpose (to be played) by being in a playable amount?
I can see both sides of the situation.
- Felting rare sets brings it's own sense of pride at seeing the table with stacks and pots of usually very unique and fun colors.
- In some instances, I am elated to acquire a rare sample because physically looking at the chip often has more impact than seeing pictures online.
Disclaimer: I am not talking about any recent or past situation, just a thought I had about chip destiny.