i stuck this in the home game section because that's where we usually have the most control over this issue, but it applies to casinos as well.
my personal preference is to have basically all $1s and $5s for $1/2 NL and mostly $1s and $5s with a smattering of $25s in $2/5 NL. i just like stacks and stacks and stacks. i remember Leonard stating the preference years ago for skipping $25s in $1/2 NL games where larger denoms were needed, preferring to just use $1s, $5s, and $100s.
i can see the other side of it, too, though, from a chip nerd view: you get to show off more chips the more denoms you have on the table.
and our preferences obviously dictate our personal sets' breakdowns. i tend to have a lot of $5s in my sets to accommodate my preference, but i often wish i liked have more denoms on the table as it would save me significant money by buying fewer high denoms rather than tons of workhorse chips.
my personal preference is to have basically all $1s and $5s for $1/2 NL and mostly $1s and $5s with a smattering of $25s in $2/5 NL. i just like stacks and stacks and stacks. i remember Leonard stating the preference years ago for skipping $25s in $1/2 NL games where larger denoms were needed, preferring to just use $1s, $5s, and $100s.
i can see the other side of it, too, though, from a chip nerd view: you get to show off more chips the more denoms you have on the table.
and our preferences obviously dictate our personal sets' breakdowns. i tend to have a lot of $5s in my sets to accommodate my preference, but i often wish i liked have more denoms on the table as it would save me significant money by buying fewer high denoms rather than tons of workhorse chips.