High hand drama at Tampa Hard Rock (2 Viewers)

UPDATE: POSTED THIS ON FACEBOOK

Headsup that Hard Rock Tampa will pull $2 jackpot drop in 1/2 PLO but making it difficult for players to qualify our high hands

In the past we had to flop our high hand and if the turn or river improved our high hand they didn't matter

Example, you have 9987 and flop is 99T

If the turn and river come

J
A

your hand at showdown was 9999A but for high hands it was 9999T

Last month they switched it, claiming their rules state they have to use your "best hand"

I bitched about it online, was told it was run up to the top (Pablo) and they couldn't fix it this month (July) but they would correct it in August so the turn or river can't screw our high hands

Well, here we are in August, lady flops quads, rivers a bigger kicker and we're told they went in the other direction and that her hand doesn't qualify

So we can't value bet our high hands because we risk losing a high hsnd payout if we mske a better kicker on quads or a higher straight flush

So you essentially need to end your hand on the flop if you want a shog at high hand now
Is it even worth it? What’s the high hand bonus usually? A couple hundred?
 
UPDATE: POSTED THIS ON FACEBOOK

Headsup that Hard Rock Tampa will pull $2 jackpot drop in 1/2 PLO but making it difficult for players to qualify our high hands

In the past we had to flop our high hand and if the turn or river improved our high hand they didn't matter

Example, you have 9987 and flop is 99T

If the turn and river come

J
A

your hand at showdown was 9999A but for high hands it was 9999T

Last month they switched it, claiming their rules state they have to use your "best hand"

I bitched about it online, was told it was run up to the top (Pablo) and they couldn't fix it this month (July) but they would correct it in August so the turn or river can't screw our high hands

Well, here we are in August, lady flops quads, rivers a bigger kicker and we're told they went in the other direction and that her hand doesn't qualify

So we can't value bet our high hands because we risk losing a high hsnd payout if we mske a better kicker on quads or a higher straight flush

So you essentially need to end your hand on the flop if you want a shog at high hand now

tenor.gif
 
now that you know the rules... you just blow everyone else off the pot whenever you flop a qualifying hand... when they fold... you scoop the high hand loot... if they call... you stack them and then scoop the high hand loot...
 
now that you know the rules... you just blow everyone else off the pot whenever you flop a qualifying hand... when they fold... you scoop the high hand loot... if they call... you stack them and then scoop the high hand loot...

It's hard to push people out on the flop in 1/2 PLO, and now you can't even value bet your hand since the high hand can be more than most players have in chips
 
Most ridiculous ruling I have heard. Makes zero sense that you cannot use the turn/river to qualify, but the casino can use them to screw you over.
This just made me think, doesn't it just depend on who you are? As in, the PLO players don't like this, but the Hold Em players do?

Does doing this one way or the other benefit the casino more?
 
This just made me think, doesn't it just depend on who you are? As in, the PLO players don't like this, but the Hold Em players do?

Does doing this one way or the other benefit the casino more?

Obviously fair enough that you have to flop the hand to qualify in PLO as opposed to HE where you can use all five cards. The problem in this instance is that the player did in fact flop it (and therefore qualified for the high hand), but ended up not qualifying after all because the kicker changed on the river (which is a card that is not intended to be used in PLO for the high hand bonus anyways ). Makes zero sense to me.

Good point about the casino making $ or not. Maybe if there's also is no other qualifying hand at all? If the casino isn't even making money on that shitty decision it just makes it even more ridiculous, as the only thing they get is pissed off players. Lol
 
What's to stop a player from flopping the high hand, and then shoving while announcing "all you fuckers should just fold to my jackpot-winning hand!" ?
 
What's to stop a player from flopping the high hand, and then shoving while announcing "all you fuckers should just fold to my jackpot-winning hand!" ?
In a cash game? Nothing
 
I know that Florida parimutuel card room are required to return 100% of the jackpot drop to players. Is this true for Hard Rock? If not, could that be a factor?
 
Ho

How does the high hand bonus work? Would the player on your table have won it by getting that hand to qualify?

We have to hold up for a 30 minute period (or whatever is left of it) so there is no guarantee we will win

I flopped Aces full of 4's and ended it on the flop, snd held for 25 minutes to win $500 tonight
 
What's to stop a player from flopping the high hand, and then shoving while announcing "all you fuckers should just fold to my jackpot-winning hand!" ?
In my local room, you can be disqualified from receiving a HHJ if you reveal that you have a qualifying hand before action is complete.
 
In my local room, you can be disqualified from receiving a HHJ if you reveal that you have a qualifying hand before action is complete.
In one of my local rooms, there would have to be a minimum of $20 in the pot (at a $2/$4 FL PLO8 game) to qualify. Nobody cared if people asked for a call, to get the pot to $20 and everybody knew what it meant.
 
Yes. That is a concern here. You'd have to do it cagey. Like asking ABOUT the high hand and then betting
Yeah, the game here is "I'd like to see a flop. How much needs to be in the pot for high hand?" when it folds to the blinds and a guy who normally chops has a big pair or a hand like AKs.
 
What's to stop a player from flopping the high hand, and then shoving while announcing "all you fuckers should just fold to my jackpot-winning hand!" ?

First off it's PLO. So you can't shove, just pot.

Second, many jackpots disqualify you if you discuss the jackpot during the hand.
 
In my local room, you can be disqualified from receiving a HHJ if you reveal that you have a qualifying hand before action is complete.
many jackpots disqualify you if you discuss the jackpot during the hand.
If I flop quad aces deuce kicker in Anthony's game, I'll take my chances. Gonna get disqualified anyway (unless it goes runner runner deuces).
 
I’m half asleep, but how does the kicker matter with quads?

Because you need to play 5 cards...kicker counts (just not needed for taking down the pot)

And it's all about the math...this way house is getting better odds
 
Because you need to play 5 cards...kicker counts (just not needed for taking down the pot)

And it's all about the math...this way house is getting better odds
Explain to me like I’m five how a kicker is at all relevant with quads? Four queens is four queens regardless if the kicker is a two or an ace. Kickers are only relevant when two hands are tied. There is no tie with quads, unless, in my example, there are three queens on the board and two players each have one of the remaining other two queens. In which case their kickers play and the table definitely needs a new deck and a new dealer. ;)
 
Explain to me like I’m five how a kicker is at all relevant with quads? Four queens is four queens regardless if the kicker is a two or an ace. Kickers are only relevant when two hands are tied. There is no tie with quads, unless, in my example, there are three queens on the board and two players each have one of the remaining other two queens. In which case their kickers play and the table definitely needs a new deck and a new dealer. ;)
We're not playing a hand at the table though, we're identifying a high hand. If I have a high hand bonus at a home game, and someone flops four of a kind on the flop, but the hand improves on the turn or river, we don't write down what they hit on the flop.

So for this, they're saying you must flop your high hand. Not "A" high hand. Consequently, if your hand improves on the turn or river, you flopped "a" high hand, but not your high hand (you turned or rivered your high hand) and are no longer eligible for high hand bonus.

It seems semantical, but I don't quite understand the uproar from everyone. If this does not somehow end up as a win for the chino, then whats the big deal? Just means more from high hand goes to hold em and such right? So someone is gonna be complaining on one side or the other. Now I know nothing about chinos, so if this does somehow earn them more money, then shame on them.
 
I believe the "logic" behind it is that you can't have a high hand if it isn't the best hand that you can play. So if you have QQ and the flop is QQ2 with a turn and river of KA, then your hand is QQQQA. On that board, your hand isn't QQQQ2.
 
We're not playing a hand at the table though, we're identifying a high hand. If I have a high hand bonus at a home game, and someone flops four of a kind on the flop, but the hand improves on the turn or river, we don't write down what they hit on the flop.

So for this, they're saying you must flop your high hand. Not "A" high hand. Consequently, if your hand improves on the turn or river, you flopped "a" high hand, but not your high hand (you turned or rivered your high hand) and are no longer eligible for high hand bonus.

It seems semantical, but I don't quite understand the uproar from everyone. If this does not somehow end up as a win for the chino, then whats the big deal? Just means more from high hand goes to hold em and such right? So someone is gonna be complaining on one side or the other. Now I know nothing about chinos, so if this does somehow earn them more money, then shame on them.
Right. I don't think it's outrageous at all. Chalk it up to quirky house rules for high hand jackpots and live with it.
 
We're not playing a hand at the table though, we're identifying a high hand. If I have a high hand bonus at a home game, and someone flops four of a kind on the flop, but the hand improves on the turn or river, we don't write down what they hit on the flop.

So for this, they're saying you must flop your high hand. Not "A" high hand. Consequently, if your hand improves on the turn or river, you flopped "a" high hand, but not your high hand (you turned or rivered your high hand) and are no longer eligible for high hand bonus.

It seems semantical, but I don't quite understand the uproar from everyone. If this does not somehow end up as a win for the chino, then whats the big deal? Just means more from high hand goes to hold em and such right? So someone is gonna be complaining on one side or the other. Now I know nothing about chinos, so if this does somehow earn them more money, then shame on them.
But in this scenario, the high hand is only counted after the flop. So it is just the first 7 cards, that way the casino can combine the NLHE table with the PLO taable for the high hand bonus.

The issue is if your high hand for the bonus only counts the flop, so the turn and river don't count for the high hand bonus, whether it make your hand better or not. The turn and river shouldn't counterfeit a hand for the high hand bonus, it should be strictly on the first 7 cards. If they want to allow the turn and river to possibly make a better hand and invalidate a PLO hand, then 2 more card should be dealt on the NLHE to give those players the same possibility to counterfeit their hands.
 
The casino needs to make it equitable between the Omaha and Hold 'Em tables, or have two separate high hand bonuses for each games.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom