Cashcan someone tell me the difference between these 3 sets of ES chips (what are each set is called). Thanks in advance.
Cash set with the best non leaded THC mold quarter and $20 chips (IMO)
Close WSOP tribute set ... somehow costs less.
The best Paulson tournament set I've ever seen ...
The $1 white cash chip is very nice! Maybe the designer of the set was going for a reverse spot progression here? Quarters and $1 are pretty busy while the $5's are less austentacious. The tri moons look awesome, but my only gripe is that the same four colors were used for the $20 and $25 chips, but I suppose there's no need for both in the same set if I was building one from scratch.My favorite white Paulson $1 ever, and super strong -- unequaled, IMO -- from the $20 on up. Just imagine if the AS $5 had been in the cash set!
(I'm not a fan of the quarter, since it doesn't even begin to fit my idea of a spot progression, so I sold mine -- but I think I'm the only one who feels that way.)
Maybe "The best Paulson tournament set I've ever seen" explains it?
Agreed.
.
.
.
(And the PStars top them all! )
I like the PStar's too, but not enough to consider a set. My BW's will have to do
I'm not a fan of the quarter, since it doesn't even begin to fit my idea of a spot progression
I think the progression makes more sense when viewed in the context of the original $1 submission (prior to GPI denying the use of V spots with white base).The $1 white cash chip is very nice! Maybe the designer of the set was going for a reverse spot progression here? Quarters and $1 are pretty busy while the $5's are less austentacious. The tri moons look awesome, but my only gripe is that the same four colors were used for the $20 and $25 chips, but I suppose there's no need for both in the same set if I was building one from scratch.
$100 and $500 are both excellent as well. Just a strong set.
I don’t love the $5 in this set, and I prefer a blue $1...but if that $1 had made it through, I would definitely have a good size set of these.I think the progression makes more sense when viewed in the context of the original $1 submission (prior to GPI denying the use of V spots with white base).
View attachment 460177
The progression goes from V spots, to V + 1/8 spots, to flattened V with 1/8 spots, to really flattened V spots (tri-moons), to double 1/8 spots, to quad-triple 1/8 spots. Having similar $20 and $25 chips allowed people to have a bright tri-moon chip regardless of denomination choice.
Ah, I was out of the loop when that happened. It certainly makes sense -- thanks for the detailed history.I think the progression makes more sense when viewed in the context of the original $1 submission (prior to GPI denying the use of V spots with white base).
View attachment 460177
The progression goes from V spots, to V + 1/8 spots, to flattened V with 1/8 spots, to really flattened V spots (tri-moons), to double 1/8 spots, to quad-triple 1/8 spots. Having similar $20 and $25 chips allowed people to have a bright tri-moon chip regardless of denomination choice.
Almost made it sound like a regression but I like those a lot!I think the progression makes more sense when viewed in the context of the original $1 submission (prior to GPI denying the use of V spots with white base).
View attachment 460177
The progression goes from V spots, to V + 1/8 spots, to flattened V with 1/8 spots, to really flattened V spots (tri-moons), to double 1/8 spots, to quad-triple 1/8 spots. Having similar $20 and $25 chips allowed people to have a bright tri-moon chip regardless of denomination choice.