Cash Set - Absolutely edge spot progression.
Tournament Set - Prefer no edge spot progression. I like simple.
Tournament Set - Prefer no edge spot progression. I like simple.
I have no problem with consistent spots, or spot "progression", whichever a person chooses. As long as the progression isn't something asinine like ABCCB of course. I think contrast between chips is far more important.I am working on putting together some artwork for a custom Cards Mold set and I’m constantly going back and forth between using the same edge spots for all denoms, or going with a spot progression, or going just completely random based on chips that I like. It seems that each day I prefer one over the other and can’t seem to make up my mind.
After looking at various casino chips, it seems hardly any of them have a well thought out progression and that it’s more random than anything. And now I feel like I’m overanalyzing the whole thing and 99% of the players in my game aren’t going to notice either way.
Any feedback/examples of your own work would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Tyler
Yes. Always. I will firmly argue with anyone who says it doesn't matter.
Argue! Argue! Argue! Argue! Argue!It doesn't matter.
Argue! Argue! Argue! Argue! Argue!
I can go both ways...
It doesn’t matterYes. Always. I will firmly argue with anyone who says it doesn't matter.
I tell you what would be really cheeky, is CPC making (more or less) exact replicas as a stock option.I loved the "cheeky" part
Yes. Always. I will firmly argue with anyone who says it doesn't matter.
It doesn’t matter