Comparison of some Playing cards. (2 Viewers)

[JCM_]

When I was browsing the forum to pick up cards.
There are some descriptions that confuse me.
I hope this will help some people who are looking for cards.


My English is not good .May not be able to correctly describe, but I will try my best.

I just use bridge cards and love regular index.

COPAG / Faded Spade / KEM / Angel / Fournier

Card color : white-->yellow?
Angel >faded spade > KEM > copag = Fournier

The number height of each card is different.

Try to shoot the reflection
Reflection degree ( When you're sitting on the edge of a table, you may not see the points )
most --> less

KEM>COPAG > Fournier > Angel ≥ Faded Spade

Thickness comparison (52cards)
FS > Fournier ≈ KEM > Copag > Angel

FS vs COPAG

FS vs KEM

FS vs Angel

FS vs Fournier

Scene feeling .

FS

COPAG

KEM

Angel

Fournier

I like to look at the cards horizontally

The strength required : more-->less

Faded Spade >>>>>Copag > Fournier > Angel >= KEM



Reflection at certain angles

Angel

KEM

Fouriner

FS

COPAG

Faded Spade thickest and hardest .
Angel thinner and softer .
I like soft cards so that I can play for a long time without getting tired.

All five are great cards . Who the nuts?

The non warping KEM is nuts. Angel is the second .
When KEM starts to warp, Angel is Nuts . Fournier is Nuts in Jumbo index.
But I don't like angel's back design a bit.

These are my personal views .


This is how I keep KEM.
The way I found in the forum
It really works

 

[monolith149]

Nice write-up, thanks. It's always nice to see direct comparisons of items.

 

[davethesave]

NICE!