Lighter:
Brighter:
Brighter:
Brighter proves more contrast so that's the clear winner in my book.
Let's muddy the waters: Light green and lavender from the top set; black and yellow from the bottom set.
(This vote was brought to you by the Blind Old Fart Poker Players of America (tm)...)
Hmmmm i thought they just upcharged when using it for the body color, didn't realize for spots too. did that change at some pointBright white spots makes the chips hella extra expensive.
Bright white spots makes the chips hella extra expensive.
I'm starting to think this is an interesting idea. I just like canary better than yellow. The lavender will contrast more with the black. I want the colors to win the day and use simple white spots so you can count stacks. I considered a normal spot progression that made progressively more complicated spots, but I want the chips to be about the colors, not the spots. The spots are just there to help count stacks.I would put the lavender and canary from top set into the bottom set. (y) :thumbsup:
I payed extra for bright white edge spots on my cash set. I'm not sure of the history behind that.Hmmmm i thought they just upcharged when using it for the body color, didn't realize for spots too. did that change at some point
The nature of real clay chips dictates that no color can be guaranteed to be free of all impurities. Bright White is inherently difficult to work with as it gets contaminated so easily. It therefore carries a premium of 53c a chip, regardless of chip style, for either body or spot color. Bright White edge spots with more noticeable (but still slight) impurities are available for no premium.
And just to confirm the above, my custom set has Bright White with "noticeable but slight impurities" edge spots in the T2000 chip and there was no extra premium cost added.From CPC's current pricing on bright white, from their website:
Easy decision for me if they were my chips: no premium for edge spots with more noticeable but still slight impurities.