2020 Custom Set of the Year entry thread (now open) (2 Viewers)

WedgeRock

Royal Flush
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Messages
19,723
Reaction score
38,203
Location
America's High-Five
@bsdunbar did a fantastic job running the 2019 custom set of the year. I hadn't seen some of the chipsets in the contest, so it was great to get a chance to get familiar with them all. And of course, voting for your favorite and tracking their progress was fun and interesting.

For 2020, I'm gonna keep the same basic format, but with an added twist.

What's the same
We will do a random draw for seeding into the tournament (all entries will be randomized and that order will be your seed, subject to class winners for CPC, Re-label, Ceramic/Hybrid and Hotstamp getting #1 seed in each quarter bracket -- open class winner still get randomly seeded; class winners will not compete in a play-in game unless there is no other option). The brackets and matchups will be determined by the size of the field. I'll use the same site that @bsdunbar1 used for determining the brackets, printyourbrackets.com. Unless we get the perfect number if entrants, some will have to play in a play-in round.

@bsdunbar1 opened his contest around 12/15/19, so I will allow sets that were created 12/16/19 forward to be eligible in 2020. However, since we are going to be voting in December, to be eligible, your set must be created on or before midnight server time on December 31, 2020 Wednesday, November 25, 2020 (the day before US Thanksgiving) to give me time to organize everything so voting can begin in December. "Created" means the chips must be posted on PCF (actual chips, not mock-ups). Chips created 11/26/20 through 12/31/20 should be eligible for the following year (and if I run it again, they will be).

All eligible sets will compete bracket style for the 2020 PCF Best Overall Chipset of the Year (BOCY)

What's new
In addition to the BOCY bracket, each chipset has the option of entering one additional "class" bracket.
  1. Best Custom CPC Fully Custom
  2. Best Relabel (anything you stuck a label on, label-over or full replacement; dice chips to Paulsons and everything in between)
  3. Best Ceramic/Hybrid
  4. Best Hotstamp (Great add, @Klobberer/Best Open Class (board games, Oh Hell chips, etc. Basically, anything that doesn't fit into one of the other classes. Note: I've added any sets with plaques here and well as tribute sets.)
I didn't list NAGBs (like Pauslons) and GBs (like the Abiattis being planned) because those are usually purchased by a group rather than an individual. If any one person creates a custom set (Matsuis, Abiatti, Paulson), they are eligible for the open class. Any NAGB/GB chipsets are eligible for the BOCY only.

The purpose of classes was to allow chipsets to compete on even ground in addition to competing against all other sets. However, if there aren't sufficient entries into a class, I may combine and/or eliminate classes.

The Open Class is intended only for chips that don't fit in another class. Right now, it does not include GB/NAGB chips, but that may change.

In addition, if we get at least 8 cash and 8 tournament sets in any one of the above classes, I'll split cash sets and tournament sets into separate sub-classes within the class.

To enter
1. Grow up.
I expect chips to be praised, but also criticized. I suggest voting for the chipset that you would select for your own homegame, if given the option, but everyone will employ their own criteria. All but one chipset will lose a vote. If you can't handle, rejection, criticism, and/or losing like an adult, please don't enter. (Likewise, if you can't criticize like an adult, please don't vote.) Also, I am working on a project that I expect to finish in 2020; if you can't handle the possibility of losing to the organizer's chips without claiming the fix was in (whether true or not), please don't enter. I will be making determinations on eligibility as well as other minutae along the way. I intend to make any decisions with impartiality and in the best interest of the contest. If you can't agree that I can be impartial, please don't enter. This is a meant to be a fun contest, not to ruin enjoyment of the forum, drive users apart or generally cause a toxic environment.

2. If you can agree to #1, then just identify a chipset (created during the eligibility period) in this thread. You can enter someone else's chips, but the owner will have to accept the nomination. I suggest separate entries for cash and tournament sets, but (despite the length of this post), I'm trying to leave as few restrictions as possible, so I'll let the nominator decide.

Iould prefer entries include details about the chips.
  • For custom CPCs: size, mold, edge spot patterns and colors for all chips in the set.
  • For relabels, the original chips (and size, mold, colors and edgespots patterns if applicable and if known) as well as the type and printer for the labels. Relabels should include all the chips in a set...if you add on a relabeled frac to an existing set, I do not consider that a custom relabel.
  • For cermics/hybrids, the type of blank and printer/manufacturer.
A link to a design thread or pr0n thread would be great.

Also, let's not forget those designers. I think they should get credit for bringing these ideas to life! A quick shout out to the designer (even if it was your own design) is appreciated.

3. If you want to enter a class, make a note of that with your entry (if you nominate someone else, the owner will be the one to choose which class they will also enter, if any).

There you have it. Now let's see the best of what's created in 2020!

Final entries: https://www.pokerchipforum.com/thre...year-entry-thread-now-open.50986/post-1415245
 
Last edited:
Best Overall Chipset of the Year entries
  1. JACK Casino Cardiff, @jr8719

Best Custom CPC Chipset of the Year entries

Best Relabel Chipset of the Year entries
  1. JACK Casino Cardiff, @jr8719

Best Ceramic/Hybrid Chipset of the Year entries

Best Hotstamp Chipset of the Year entries


Best Open Class Chipset of the Year entries
 
Last edited:
May I suggest reducing the randomness just a tad by separating sets by the same person?
I'm not opposed to it. If we had 40 entries, I could randomize 20 and 20 and make sure your sets were in opposite halfs. But how to fill out the other 19? By entry order? What if a ton of strong sets were entered early? Then they all face off on one half of the bracket? And a late-entered strong set has a cakewalk to the finals on the other side.

If you come up with a way, I'll consider it...

I don't want any of my 2020 NAGB:s facing off against each other until the final.
Well played sir. Well played.
 
The scrub donkey GB reminded me that we need a best hybrid class, as they are not really ceramics. Ironically, being a GB, they won't be eligible for the cards classes, just the Best Overall Chipset bracket.

I hope I'm not slicing this too thin.
 
If you come up with a way, I'll consider it...
One way would be to randomize the whole bracket, then repeat the following two steps until done:

1) Find a person with more sets on a side than there should be (e.g. a person with two sets total having two sets on one half, or 3-4 sets total having 3 on one side, etc)
2) Randomized a set on the other side of the bracket that you can swap with. If the selected person would end up with too many sets on that side if swapped, then he/she is not eligible to swap and you need to pick another.

If someone has 3 or more sets, the two on the same side should not be on the same quarter, and the steps above can be repeated but restricted to that side of the bracket. 5 or more sets and two should not be on the same eighth, etc...

There might be a smarter way, but this greedy algorithm should solve it without too much extra work. Especially since it's you who is doing the work ;)
 
What about best Group Buy class then?

How many group buys are there going to be in 2020? Three? Five? Is that enough to run a separate class? If there are sufficient group buys to make it reasonable, I might add it later.

But for now, GBs and NAGBs can compete in the BOCY.
 
One way would be to randomize the whole bracket, then repeat the following two steps until done:

1) Find a person with more sets on a side than there should be (e.g. a person with two sets total having two sets on one half, or 3-4 sets total having 3 on one side, etc)
2) Randomized a set on the other side of the bracket that you can swap with. If the selected person would end up with too many sets on that side if swapped, then he/she is not eligible to swap and you need to pick another.

If someone has 3 or more sets, the two on the same side should not be on the same quarter, and the steps above can be repeated but restricted to that side of the bracket. 5 or more sets and two should not be on the same eighth, etc...

There might be a smarter way, but this greedy algorithm should solve it without too much extra work. Especially since it's you who is doing the work ;)
Sounds like too much work... Still thinking random.
 
Sounds like too much work... Still thinking random.
How about seeding the winners from each category in the open event? That way you won't have champions squaring of until the semis or quarterfinals. Currently there are 5 categories besides the open event, so you could randomize the champion's seeds 1-5. Then seeds 1-3 would have a "champion free" path to the semis, and 4 and 5 would meet in the quarterfinals if undefeated.
 
How about seeding the winners from each category in the open event? That way you won't have champions squaring of until the semis or quarterfinals. Currently there are 5 categories besides the open event, so you could randomize the champion's seeds 1-5. Then seeds 1-3 would have a "champion free" path to the semis, and 4 and 5 would meet in the quarterfinals if undefeated.
I was trying to figure out how to make this work. Your thoughts are appreciated.

I combined hybrids/cermics into one class. The Class winners for CPC, Re-label, Ceramic/Hybrid and Hotstamp will each be seeded in different quadrants so they will not meet, if at all, until the semifinals. The winner of the open class will be randomly seeded.

EDIT: Class winners/#1 seeds will be exempt from play-in games unless the number if entries require it (#4 will be the first to get a play-in game if required, then #3, then #2... I think that means the #1 seed never gets a play-in game because if it happens, then it'll be a new full round).

The highest average votes per round for the class winner will determine which class gets #1 seed, #2 seed, etc. That should get people stumping for extra votes. Yes, this punishes an awesome set that goes up against another awesome set in the final, but squeaks out a win; but it also rewards an that that wins by a landslide. Maybe. I guess it's possible that a close call gets more attention and therefore more votes that a landslide match...

Anyway, I'm rambling.
 
Last edited:
The winner of the open class will be randomly seeded.
Open class? Aren't we talking about the brackets for the open class? Or have I misunderstood something?

Class winners/#1 seeds will be exempt from play-in games unless the number if entries require it (#4 will be the first to get a play-in game if required, then #3, then #2
Sounds correct.
I think that means the #1 seed never gets a play-in game because if it happens, then it'll be a new full round).
Yes, that's correct. A #1 seed always has as few rounds as possible, and equal nr of rounds as everyone else if 2, 4, 8, 16 etc contestants.
The highest average votes per round for the class winner will determine which class gets #1 seed, #2 seed, etc.
If you're up for it, why not? I don't think it's super important, though. I'd rather have you use that energy to separate the sets from the same person. :sneaky:
 
Here's an idea: I don't like the idea of having class winners battling their class runner ups in the open class. An easy way to separate them is to let the set that lost to seed #1 get seed 6, the set that lost to seed #2 gets seed #5, the set that lost to seed #3 gets seed #8, and the set that lost to seed #4 gets seed #7. Then all class finalists will be on opposing sides of each other, and it's hardly any extra work. :)
 
Here's an idea: I don't like the idea of having class winners battling their class runner ups in the open class. An easy way to separate them is to let the set that lost to seed #1 get seed 6, the set that lost to seed #2 gets seed #5, the set that lost to seed #3 gets seed #8, and the set that lost to seed #4 gets seed #7. Then all class finalists will be on opposing sides of each other, and it's hardly any extra work. :)
Fair.

But with random, a Class runner up may not even get in the same quarter bracket ("Region") as the Class winner.
 
Open class? Aren't we talking about the brackets for the open class? Or have I misunderstood something
There are 5 classes: CPC, Relabel, Hotstamp, Ceramic/Hybrid and Open (anything except GB's/NAGB's that don't fit elsewhere).

Those class winners (except the Open class) get top seeds in each quadrant of the "Best in Show," the Best Overall Chip of the Year (BOCY).
 
@bsdunbar1 opened his contest around 12/15/19, so I will allow sets that were created 12/16/19 forward to be eligible in 2020. However, since we are going to be voting in December, to be eligible, your set must be created on or before Wednesday, November 25, 2020 (the day before US Thanksgiving) to give me time to organize everything so voting can begin in December. "Created" means the chips must be postes on PCF (actual chips, not mock-ups). Chips created 11/26/20 through 12/31/20 should be eligible for the following year (and if I run it again, they will be).

@Doumsey , is your BellaJo set eligible to enter the contest ?
 
Hum well I received them on December 14 in France.. so... yeah I guess !

But no rush, I didnt even have the time to do a proper pr0n with them !!
Oiling session is this week end, they will be shiny and ready for 2020 contest ;)
 
Early teaser...

BCF4BD4B-3E7E-48B7-9A46-D22EA79A0CE2.jpeg
 
Hum well I received them on December 14 in France.. so... yeah I guess !

But no rush, I didnt even have the time to do a proper pr0n with them !!
Oiling session is this week end, they will be shiny and ready for 2020 contest ;)

If you haven't posted them on PCF yet, they haven't been "created.". My brightline rules around here aren't that popular, but I wanted a way to objectively verify when new sets are revealed.

"Created" means the chips must be posted on PCF (actual chips, not mock-ups).
 
If you haven't posted them on PCF yet, they haven't been "created.". My brightline rules around here aren't that popular, but I wanted a way to objectively verify when new sets are revealed.

Yeah I figured those are the rules. Susie's secondaries have never been labeled and I'll finish them this summer so I think they qualify but need a ruling. Another set was in gears hands for a couple years until the huge mill job was finished. Never seen yet so that would be a new one to the forum. Two new Rosie's sets in the CPC queue, tourney and a stamped limit set. So maybe I have 4...or 5 if the project with Pat gets underway.
 
Susie's secondaries have never been labeled and I'll finish them this summer so I think they qualify but need a ruling.
Generally, a secondary set would be distinct and separate from the primary set... If part of a set was "created" and a new debit was added or a denom was replaced, that wouldn't constitute a new set.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom