too bad they are damaged
I would have to respectfuly disagree with them being 'damaged' though... They are casino used chips with nicks, as I described and pictured...
Respectful or not, you're delusional if you don't think that chips with nicked and chipped edges are damaged chips. It may be due to normal casino use, and even expected and/or inevitable, but it's damage nonetheless.
Okay... Here we go...
By your definition, every single chips that has a nick or a chip is damaged, I get it... To me damaged means it cannot be "reasonably used"... By your definition, all chips that have heavy casino use are damaged, again, if that's what you want to call it, do it... I, once again, respectfully disagree... All the used Terrible's chips sold by Jim were damaged by your definition... Or is it just because those are mine? The one rack I put up for sale? I never said they were mint or anything, on the contrary...
I did not misrepresent the chips in ANY way... I mention they were used and that that use was represented by chip and nicks... And I specifically put a overhead picture to show that... Those chips could have gone for whatever people think your "damaged" chips are worth, 0.02¢ or whatever!! Personally, I don't care, it's just a rack... I bought those chips directly from Jim a few years back and they represent the average condition of ALL those GV snappers... There was no adverse selection done whatsoever differently than what some people do... Trust me, I was a victim of those adverse selection in the past a few times...
I have played in many casinos with chips that were in much worse condition than those, trust me...
The bottom line is that I called those chips casino used with nicks and chipped edges... If you want to called them damaged, please do so, but please be consistent when you're selling used chips with nicks, if you ever do so... Not going to argue semantics anymore... I described the chips fairly, put the pictures of the chips up and started the auction with a zero price and no reserve... What else do you want from me? Do you want me to called the chips damaged on the description? Is that what you want? Where did I go wrong in your opinion?
lol, till359 musta hit a nerve or sumptin...
Nobody ever said ANYTHING about you misrepresenting those chips, or questioned your integrity or fairness. Just your misguided opinion that nicked chips aren't damaged. The fact that they are damaged is what lowers their value vs new/mint/undamaged chips.
I don't think you've done anything wrong at all. You stated the condition of the chips quite accurately, and provided pics that clearly depict their condition.
But ain't no gettin' around the fact that they are damaged, and if somebody wants to use that terminology, it's accurate. I think your definition of 'damaged' is actually closer to 'destroyed'.
It's not really up for debate, as the definition clearly applies. In any case, no need for bunched panties.
You, coming here and calling me delusional for my opinion, are basically calling me dishonest...
You saying the chips should be called damaged and not used, are calling me a cheat...
Nothing wrong with your sale or description, chaos. Multiple pics, accurate description and more than fair auction.
It's inaccurate at best, and devious at worst, for people to say they are damaged. They have casino wear or whatever, but they're not irreparably damaged. I don't know if their motives are to undermine your sale if they hope to lower the price or to just troll the thread.
i have to rectify
what i wanted to say is used not damaged
wich for me is the same because nicks and other are damages due to the use of the chips my choice of word may not have be the best possible but it's a fact
and it was absolutely not about you
you have listed thoses as used with perfect description and great pics, you make your job perfectly and honestly when posting the auction
nothing wrong in your description and i have never say otherwise this is just a misunderstanding
i said that simply because what i search is mint this is why this is bad for me that they are not, simply that and nothing else
i just want to precise, i have say that cause in the headline of this topic the state is not precised
if i offended you i appologize
If not "damaged" then what word would you use to describe the nicks on a few of those chips?
I'm not insinuating you've done anything wrong aside from maybe getting a little ruffled over a word a couple times.
And I'm sure this thread got the attention of some people who might not have seen it otherwise.
And I maintain my right to feel like that when someone is implying I am selling damaged goods and being dishonest... I certainly understand your right to feel differently if you were the seller but there's no reason for you to tell me I am wrong to feel the way I do...
You certainly do have that right... but NOBODY ever said or implied that you were dishonest. That's misunderstanding's on you. Sorry you got offended over nothing.
lololol used = damaged. gimme a fckn break dave.
Tommy is being so chaotic neutral in this thread.